eldersnake
we.loveprivacy.clubNo description provided.
↳
In-reply-to
»
@prologic what do we make of Labor's proposed social media minimum age ban, I.e ID verification, and the likes of Yarn? I haven't been able to find out exactly how far the legislation goes, but some have said it's broad enough to include any site that even has a comment section 🤔 but that could be FUD.
⤋ Read More
@prologic@twtxt.net Cheers, mate, just saw this reply so thank you. And hope you are feeling better now!
I agree with what you say too. The whole thing is just an odd approach and can’t possibly be effective, all the while causing inconveniences or at worst, being plain weird and invasive like ID verification.
↳
In-reply-to
»
The web is such garbage these days 😔 Or is it the garbage search engines? 🤔
⤋ Read More
@prologic@twtxt.net yes.
↳
In-reply-to
»
@prologic what do we make of Labor's proposed social media minimum age ban, I.e ID verification, and the likes of Yarn? I haven't been able to find out exactly how far the legislation goes, but some have said it's broad enough to include any site that even has a comment section 🤔 but that could be FUD.
⤋ Read More
@prologic@twtxt.net All good mate.
↳
In-reply-to
»
Lol. "Lighty Encrypted" https://www.pcmag.com/news/hot-topic-breach-confirmed-millions-of-credit-cards-email-addresses-exposed
⤋ Read More
Oof, is it any wonder some of us don’t want to just give out our info online willy-nilly.
Also that credit card ‘encryption’ will likely land that company in very hot water, no doubt far away from PCI DSS requirements.
@prologic@twtxt.net what do we make of Labor’s proposed social media minimum age ban, I.e ID verification, and the likes of Yarn? I haven’t been able to find out exactly how far the legislation goes, but some have said it’s broad enough to include any site that even has a comment section 🤔 but that could be FUD.
↳
In-reply-to
»
Generative AI Doesn't Have a Coherent Understanding of the World, MIT Researchers Find
Long-time Slashdot reader Geoffrey.landis writes: Despite its impressive output, a recent study from MIT suggests generative AI doesn't have a coherent understanding of the world. While the best-performing large language models have surprising capabilities that make it seem like the models are implicitly learn ... ⌘ Read more
⤋ Read More
I like this comment on Slashdot in the above link:
LLMs don’t have an understanding of anything. They can only regurgitate derivations of what they’ve been trained on and can’t apply that to something new in the same ways that humans or even other animals can. The models are just so large that the illusion is impressive.
So true.