@anth@a.9srv.net you wrote:

“Edits and Deletions should go; see also Section 6. This is probably the worst example of this document pushing a text document to do more protocol-like things.”

Edit and deletions are precisely what brought us here. Currently, if one replies to a twtxt, and the original gets later edited, it breaks replies, and potentially drastically changes context.

@bender@twtxt.net I am also in camp no edit signals. deletes only breaks the head of a thread. all the replies are unaffected.

@xuu@txt.sour.is what do we want then? Just up the hash size to avoid collisions? I figure that’s easy. It’s going to be a short call tomorrow then. 😂🥳

Well the poll clearly shows:

• ~65/35 in favor of Content Addressing
  
• ~60/40 in favor of supporting Edit/Delete
  
• ~70/30 against more cryptograph
  

And an NPS score of 7/10 🤣

@xuu@txt.sour.is Do you think we should just detect edits at the client-level then? 🤔

@sorenpeter@darch.dk well edits can be detected with either approach really